Children, infants and fellow passengers – who on the booking can claim?
At a glance
Compensation under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 is calculated per passenger and not per booking. Every traveller on the booking who has a confirmed reservation on the flight concerned and – except where the flight was cancelled – presented themselves for check-in in time may therefore be covered, children and adults alike: a child with a ticket of their own counts as a passenger like anyone else, provided the Regulation's conditions are met. Two groups fall outside it under Article 3(3), however: those travelling free of charge and those travelling at a reduced fare that is not available directly or indirectly to the public.
In this article
Check your compensation
Free preliminary check. You can change your choice later.
Another flight problemCompensation follows the passenger, not the booking reference
The Regulation speaks throughout of passengers. The compensation in Article 7 is paid to passengers, and the level is determined by the distance of the flight. The fact that four people were booked together and paid for with the same card does not therefore turn them into a single claim – it may be four separate claims, each assessed on its own.
The basic condition is set out in Article 3(2)(a): the passenger must have a confirmed reservation on the flight concerned and, except in the case of cancellation referred to in Article 5, present themselves for check-in as stipulated and at the time indicated in advance and in writing by the air carrier, the tour operator or an authorised travel agent, or – if no time is indicated – not later than 45 minutes before the published departure time. Article 2(g) explains what a reservation is: that the passenger has a ticket, or other proof, which indicates that the reservation has been accepted and registered by the air carrier or tour operator.
The fare paid does not affect the fixed sum. A child who travelled on a discounted child fare may be entitled to the same amount as the adult in the next seat, because Article 7(1) ties the level to the distance of the flight and not to what each traveller paid. Article 11 also requires the operating air carrier to give priority to, among others, unaccompanied children, and under Article 11(2) that group has the right to care in accordance with Article 9 as soon as possible in cases of denied boarding, cancellation and delays of any length.
Quick overview: who on the booking may be covered
- The compensation in Article 7 is paid to passengers – four people on one booking can mean four separate claims.
- The level in Article 7(1) is governed by the distance of the flight, not by what the ticket cost. A discounted ticket therefore does not in itself produce a lower fixed sum.
- Basic condition: a confirmed reservation on the flight concerned and, except where the flight is cancelled, check-in in time (Article 3(2)(a)).
- Tickets issued under a frequent flyer programme or other commercial programme are expressly covered by the Regulation (Article 3(3), second sentence, confirmed in the Commission's interpretative guidelines).
- Anyone travelling free of charge, or at a reduced fare that is not available directly or indirectly to the public, falls outside the Regulation (Article 3(3), first sentence).
- Unaccompanied children are to be given priority under Article 11.
Article 3(3): travel free of charge and reduced fares not open to the public
Under the first sentence of Article 3(3), the Regulation does not apply to passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare that is not available directly or indirectly to the public. The Commission's interpretative guidelines from 2024 point to special fares offered by air carriers to their own staff as an example of such fares.
The second sentence of the same provision establishes the opposite for reward travel: the Regulation applies to passengers having tickets issued under a frequent flyer programme or other commercial programme by an air carrier or tour operator. The Commission's guidelines repeat the same point. A trip booked with points should therefore not be dismissed with the argument that it was free.
The guidelines also state what decides the matter for a reduced fare: whether the reduction is reserved to a specific group of people or open to anyone who wishes to book, even if certain conditions must be met. In the latter case the ticket counts as available to the public. Child fares are not mentioned expressly, but a child discount that the airline publishes openly in its own booking engine sits further from the internal staff fare the guidelines point to. What decides the matter is whether the particular fare you paid was open to anyone who wished to book, not what the discount was called.
An infant without a seat of their own – what the rules say, and what they do not
An infant travelling on an adult's lap is given no seat of their own and often pays only a small fee – sometimes nothing at all. The decisive provision is above all Article 3(3): if the child travels free of charge, the child falls outside the Regulation. According to the Commission's 2024 interpretative guidelines, travelling free of charge means being transported without any pecuniary obligation on the part of the passenger. Where the fare has been reduced to zero but taxes and other charges were still paid for the ticket, the guidelines do not count the journey as free of charge.
The Court of Justice has ruled on the lap infant travelling free of charge. In an order of 11 October 2021 in Case C-686/20 (Vueling Airlines), the Court held that a passenger who travels free of charge on account of their young age, but who does not have an allocated seat or a boarding pass and whose name does not appear on the reservations booked by the parents, is excluded from the scope of the Regulation. The Commission's 2024 guidelines repeat this. How an infant who paid something for the journey and appears on the booking is to be assessed is a question the Court has not ruled on.
In practice that means two things. Bring the claim for everyone on the booking who paid for their journey – including an infant for whom you paid taxes, charges or an infant fare – and ask the operating air carrier to state which provision any refusal relies on. And expect the older children's claims to be the formally strongest: a five-year-old with their own paid ticket and their own seat normally meets the same conditions as an adult.
From 23 October 2027 the rules change under Regulation (EU) 2026/2202: infants under two travelling free of charge, or at a fare not available to the public, will then be covered by the Regulation – but not by the right to compensation in Article 7. Until then, the rules described here apply.
How the amount is calculated per passenger
The level in Article 7(1) is determined by the distance of the flight and is the same for every passenger covered, adult or child. It is not affected by what each ticket cost. The amount may, however, be reduced under Article 7(2) if the operating air carrier offers re-routing that reaches the final destination within the time limits set out there. The rule is the same for adults and children, but it is assessed against the re-routing each passenger is actually offered.
| Flight distance | Compensation level |
|---|---|
| Flights up to 1,500 km | €250 |
| 1,500–3,500 km (and longer intra-EU flights) | €400 |
| Flights over 3,500 km | €600 |
The amounts apply per passenger.
The airline may halve the amount if it offers rerouting that arrives no more than 2 hours (up to 1,500 km), 3 hours (1,500–3,500 km and longer intra-EU flights) or 4 hours (other flights over 3,500 km) after the original arrival time (Article 7(2)). For a delay on a flight over 3,500 km to or from a country outside the EU, the amount may also be halved if you arrive at least three but less than four hours late (Court of Justice, Sturgeon and Others, paragraph 63).
Example: four people on the same booking
A family books a flight on a single booking: two adults on full-fare tickets, a five-year-old on a discounted child fare and an infant travelling free of charge on a lap. The flight is cancelled three days before departure, the operating air carrier invokes no extraordinary circumstances and the family is not offered the kind of re-routing close to the original schedule that removes the right to compensation under Article 5(1)(c).
The two adults and the five-year-old have their own paid tickets with a confirmed reservation, and because the flight was cancelled no check-in is required. Each of them may be covered individually, and the child's discount does not reduce the child's fixed sum. The infant travelled free of charge, and travel free of charge is expressly excluded by the first sentence of Article 3(3) – so for the infant there is normally no claim to pursue. The other three claims can be pursued in parallel, and the claim for the five-year-old is brought on the child's behalf by whoever legally represents the child.
How to pursue claims for several people
Count passengers, not bookings
List every person on the booking with their name, ticket number and what the ticket cost. One claim per passenger, even if everything was paid for in a single transaction.
Separate out those who travelled free of charge
Did anyone travel entirely free of charge, or at a fare that was not available directly or indirectly to the public? Article 3(3) may then exclude that person alone – but it says nothing about the paying fellow passengers. According to the Commission's guidelines, free of charge means that nothing at all was paid: if you paid taxes or other charges for someone's ticket, that person did not travel free of charge.
Bring the child's claim as the child's legal representative
The Regulation does not say who claims on a child's behalf; that follows from national law. Under Swedish law, for example, Chapter 12, Section 1 of the Children and Parents Code (föräldrabalken, 1949:381) provides that the guardian administers the assets of a minor and represents them in matters relating to those assets, and a child in the custody of both parents has both parents as guardians (Chapter 10, Section 2). Whoever brings the claim, the amount is the child's.
Ask for written reasons for each person
If the carrier refuses someone's claim, ask which provision the refusal relies on. A refusal concerning a passenger who travelled free of charge does not determine the other passengers' claims.
Common questions about children, infants and fellow passengers
No. The level in Article 7(1) is determined by the distance of the flight, not by the fare paid. A child who is covered by the Regulation may be entitled to the same amount as an adult on the same flight.
Not within the meaning of the Regulation. The second sentence of Article 3(3) expressly states that the Regulation applies to passengers having tickets issued under a frequent flyer programme or other commercial programme by an air carrier or tour operator, and the Commission's interpretative guidelines repeat it. If the operating air carrier rejects the claim on the argument that the trip was free, you can point there.
The per-passenger principle is the same. In Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07, Sturgeon and Others, judgment of 19 November 2009, the Court of Justice of the EU held that a delay of three hours or more at the final destination may give rise to compensation under Article 7 in the same way as a cancelled flight, unless the operating air carrier proves extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
The compensation in Article 7 is paid to the passenger, and the passenger is the child. The Regulation does not say who claims on a child's behalf; that follows from national law. Under Swedish law, for example, Chapter 12, Section 1 of the Children and Parents Code provides that the guardian administers the assets of a minor and represents them in matters relating to those assets – so in Sweden it is the guardian, or both parents where they share custody, who brings the claim and receives the amount on the child's behalf.
Check your compensation
Free preliminary check. You can change your choice later.
Another flight problemShow all 6 sources
Every factual statement in this article rests on one of the sources below: EU regulations, judgments of the EU Court of Justice and the authorities' own pages.
Sources
- Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 · EUR-Lex · Regulation · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Commission Notice - Interpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and on Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 (C/2024/5687, OJ C series, 25.9.2024) · EUR-Lex / European Commission · Authority · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 October 2021, Case C-686/20, YE and Others v Vueling Airlines SA (ECLI:EU:C:2021:859) · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the European Union · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Föräldrabalk (1949:381) - Swedish Children and Parents Code, Chapter 10, Section 2 and Chapter 12, Section 1 · Sveriges riksdag (Swedish Parliament) · Other official · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Judgment in Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07, Sturgeon and Others v Condor Flugdienst and Böck and Lepuschitz v Air France (19 November 2009) · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the European Union · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-01
- Regulation (EU) 2026/2202 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2026 amending Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 (OJ L, 2.10.2026) · EUR-Lex (Official Journal of the European Union) · Regulation · retrieved 2026-10-05
