Skip to content
Airlate

Your flight landed at a different airport – compensation, taxi or neither?

At a glance

Where the aircraft lands at a different airport which serves the same town, city or region as the one booked, compensation cannot, according to the Court of Justice of the EU, be claimed on the ground of cancellation. The question is assessed instead under the rules on delay: you may be covered by the right to compensation under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 if you reach your final destination three hours or more after the arrival time originally planned, unless the operating air carrier can prove that the delay was caused by extraordinary circumstances. The delay is measured up to the time when, at the end of the transfer, you actually reach the airport for which the booking was made, not up to when the aircraft landed. The operating air carrier must also offer, on its own initiative, to bear the cost of the transport there. If, instead, the aircraft lands at an airport which does not serve the same town, city or region, the diversion is, as a rule, treated as a cancellation.

By · Published · Updated

10 min read6 sources
Passenger jet on a wet runway at a small airport in the evening
Illustrative image. It does not show a real flight, airport or person. · AI-generated with Adobe Firefly
In this article
  1. When does a diversion count as a cancellation?
  2. Which point in time determines the length of the delay?
  3. How much the compensation can be
  4. What to do when you have landed at a different airport
  5. Amended rules from 23 October 2027
  6. Common questions about landing at a different airport

Check your compensation

Free preliminary check. You can change your choice later.

Another flight problem

When does a diversion count as a cancellation?

Under Article 2(l) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, cancellation means the non-operation of a flight which was previously planned and on which at least one place was reserved. The Court of Justice of the EU has held that it is not enough that the aircraft left in accordance with the scheduled itinerary: it must also have reached its destination as it appears in that itinerary. A diverted flight must therefore, as a rule, be regarded as cancelled. But the Court makes an exception: where the aircraft lands at an airport which serves the same town, city or region as the one booked, it would, according to the Court, be consistent neither with the purpose of the regulation nor with the principle of equal treatment to treat the diversion in the same way as a cancellation. Compensation cannot then be claimed on that ground. The question is assessed instead under the rules on delay. Where the airport does not serve the same town, city or region, however, the general rule applies. The Court of Justice has confirmed that such a diversion may give rise to compensation for cancellation (order of 6 October 2021 in Case C‑253/21, TUIfly).

The question was decided on 22 April 2021 in Case C‑826/19, WZ v Austrian Airlines AG, by the Fourth Chamber of the Court of Justice following a request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg in Austria. The passenger had a single booking for a journey from Klagenfurt via Vienna to Berlin Tegel on 21 May 2018, with arrival at Tegel scheduled for 22.20. As the aircraft was unable to land at Tegel because of the prohibition on night flights in force, it was diverted to Berlin Schönefeld, where the passenger arrived at 23.18.

The Court explains the equal-treatment point with an example. If the diversion counted as a cancellation, a passenger who, at the end of the transfer, reached the airport for which the booking was made with a delay of less than three hours would be granted compensation, while a passenger whose flight landed at the correct airport with a comparable delay would get nothing, despite a similar inconvenience. The Court stated at the same time that, on such a diversion, a passenger is, as a rule, entitled to compensation under the regulation where he or she reaches his or her final destination three hours or more after the arrival time originally planned by the operating air carrier.

Which point in time determines the length of the delay?

The relevant point in time is not when the aircraft landed at the alternative airport, but when, at the end of the transfer, you actually reach the airport for which the booking was made, or, as the case may be, another close-by destination agreed with the operating air carrier. The time spent waiting for the transport and the journey time between the airports therefore count. Conversely, as the Court also points out, this means that a carrier can avoid the obligation to pay compensation under Article 7 if it ensures that passengers arrive without a delay of three hours or more beyond the original planned arrival time.

The three-hour threshold itself does not come from this judgment but from Joined Cases C‑402/07 and C‑432/07, Sturgeon and Others, of 19 November 2009. There, passengers on long-delayed flights were treated in the same way as passengers on cancelled flights for the purposes of the right to compensation, but compensation is not payable if the carrier can prove extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.

At a glance: landing at a different airport

  • A diversion to an airport which serves the same town, city or region does not give rise to compensation on the ground of cancellation (Court of Justice of the EU, C‑826/19).
  • Where the airport does not serve the same town, city or region, the diversion is, as a rule, treated as a cancellation and may give rise to compensation on that ground (Court of Justice of the EU, C‑253/21).
  • The delay is counted up to the time when, at the end of the transfer, you reach the airport for which the booking was made, or an agreed close-by destination.
  • If you reach your final destination three hours or more after the arrival time originally planned, you may be covered by the right to compensation (C‑402/07 and C‑432/07, Sturgeon and Others).
  • The operating air carrier must offer, on its own initiative, to bear the cost of the onward transport (Article 8(3)).
  • If the carrier does not bear the cost of the transport, you can claim back expenses that were necessary, appropriate and reasonable – but that does not give a right to the flat-rate amount under Article 7(1).
  • The burden of proving extraordinary circumstances lies with the operating air carrier (Article 5(3)).

Example: the aircraft lands at an airport other than the one booked

You have booked a flight to Arlanda with arrival scheduled for 21.30. The aircraft is diverted and lands instead at 22.10 at another airport nearby. The transfer does not leave for a good hour and you are standing at Arlanda at 00.50. Measured to the airport for which the booking was made, the delay is a little over three hours, not forty minutes. You may then be covered by the right to compensation, provided that the conditions are otherwise met and that the operating air carrier cannot prove extraordinary circumstances. Whether the airport in question serves the same town, city or region as Arlanda is an assessment made in the individual case. If it does not, the diversion may instead count as a cancellation (see the questions below).

How much the compensation can be

If the delay measured to the airport for which the booking was made is three hours or more, and the operating air carrier cannot prove extraordinary circumstances, the compensation is calculated by the distance of the flight, not by what the ticket or the transfer cost. On the longest flights the amount may in certain cases be halved where the delay is less than four hours.

Flight distanceCompensation level
Flights up to 1,500 km€250
1,500–3,500 km (and longer intra-EU flights)€400
Flights over 3,500 km€600

The amounts apply per passenger.

The airline may halve the amount if it offers rerouting that arrives no more than 2 hours (up to 1,500 km), 3 hours (1,500–3,500 km and longer intra-EU flights) or 4 hours (other flights over 3,500 km) after the original arrival time (Article 7(2)). For a delay on a flight over 3,500 km to or from a country outside the EU, the amount may also be halved if you arrive at least three but less than four hours late (Court of Justice, Sturgeon and Others, paragraph 63).

What to do when you have landed at a different airport

  1. Note down two times

    Write down when the aircraft landed and when you actually reached the airport for which the booking was made. It is the second of those times that determines the length of the delay.

  2. Ask about the transport on the spot

    The carrier is to offer it on its own initiative, but a documented refusal is valuable if you end up having to pay out of your own pocket.

  3. Keep your receipts

    Did you pay for a bus, train or taxi? Expenses that were necessary, appropriate and reasonable can be claimed back.

  4. Keep the two claims apart

    The cost of the transport and any compensation for the delay are separate matters. A carrier that pays for the bus has not thereby settled the question of compensation.

Amended rules from 23 October 2027

This article describes the rules that apply until 22 October 2027. From 23 October 2027, Regulation (EU) 2026/2202, which amends Regulation 261/2004, applies. Under the new definition in Article 2(l), a flight that is diverted to an airport other than the one on the ticket, and cannot continue there, expressly counts as a cancellation. The exception for airports serving the same town, city or region is set out in the new Article 5(6). It applies only if the airline provided transport to the airport of arrival indicated on the ticket and the delay at arrival there does not exceed three hours.

Common questions about landing at a different airport

Check your compensation

Free preliminary check. You can change your choice later.

Another flight problem
Show all 6 sources

Every factual statement in this article rests on one of the sources below: EU regulations, judgments of the EU Court of Justice and the authorities' own pages.

Sources

  1. Judgment in Case C‑826/19, WZ v Austrian Airlines AG (Fourth Chamber, 22 April 2021) · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the EU · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-01
  2. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Articles 2(h), 2(l), 5(3), 7 and 8(3) · EUR-Lex · Regulation · retrieved 2026-10-01
  3. Judgment in Joined Cases C‑402/07 and C‑432/07, Sturgeon and Others v Condor Flugdienst GmbH and Böck and Lepuschitz v Air France SA (Fourth Chamber, 19 November 2009) · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the EU · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-01
  4. Order in Case C‑253/21, FI and RE v TUIfly GmbH (Ninth Chamber, 6 October 2021), ECLI:EU:C:2021:840 · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the EU · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-06
  5. Commission Notice – Interpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 (C/2024/5687, OJ C, 25.9.2024) · EUR-Lex / European Commission · Authority · retrieved 2026-10-06
  6. Regulation (EU) 2026/2202 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2026 amending Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 (OJ L, 2.10.2026) · EUR-Lex · Regulation · retrieved 2026-10-06

Find out if you are entitled to compensation

Leave the paperwork, lengthy correspondence and negotiations to us. Our success-based fee is deducted from the compensation we secure on your behalf. You only pay when we succeed.