Taxes, charges and booking fees: what is included in the reimbursement?
At a glance
If the operating air carrier cancels the flight and you choose reimbursement rather than re-routing, the starting point in Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 is that the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought is to be reimbursed within seven days, for the part or parts of the journey not made, provided the Regulation applies to your flight. The Court of Justice has held that a commission added to the price by an intermediary is normally to be counted into the ticket price to be reimbursed. If you are instead the one who does not travel, Article 8(1)(a) does not apply, but Sweden's Consumer Agency states that air tax is to be paid back whatever the ticket type, together with those charges the airline does not have to pay because you are not travelling.

In this article
Check your compensation
Free preliminary check. You can change your choice later.
Another flight problemWhat Article 8(1)(a) actually says
Under Article 8(1), where a flight is cancelled the operating air carrier must offer a choice: reimbursement, re-routing at the earliest opportunity, or re-routing at a later date. If you choose reimbursement, it is Article 8(1)(a) that governs, and three things follow from its wording.
The starting point is the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought, not a net price, not an internal ticket value. The reimbursement covers the part or parts of the journey not made, and also the part or parts already made if the flight is no longer serving any purpose in relation to your original travel plan. The time limit is seven days.
The form is governed by Article 7(3), to which Article 8(1)(a) expressly refers: in cash, by electronic bank transfer, bank orders or bank cheques, or in travel vouchers and/or other services, but then only with your signed agreement. A travel voucher you have not given your signed agreement to is therefore not a reimbursement within the meaning of the Regulation.
The booking site's service fee: Harms v Vueling
Many tickets are bought through a booking site that adds a fee of its own. Whether that fee belongs to the ticket price to be reimbursed was decided by the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice on 12 September 2018 in Case C-601/17, Harms and Others v Vueling Airlines SA.
The Court's answer: the price of the ticket to be taken into consideration for the purposes of determining the reimbursement includes the difference between the amount paid by the passenger and the amount received by the air carrier, that is, the intermediary's commission. There is a proviso. The commission is not to be counted in if it was set without the knowledge of the air carrier, and the Court left that assessment to the national court.
In practice the judgment means that what you paid is the reference point, not what the airline took in. If you paid the booking site more than the carrier received, the difference may be covered, but the airline can object to precisely that item, if the fee was set without its knowledge.
Quick overview: reimbursement when a flight is cancelled
- The basis is the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought, for the part or parts of the journey not made (Article 8(1)(a)).
- Parts already made may also be covered, if the flight is no longer serving any purpose in relation to your original travel plan.
- The time limit is seven days.
- The form is governed by Article 7(3). A travel voucher instead of money requires your signed agreement.
- An intermediary's commission is normally to be counted into the price reimbursed (Court of Justice, C-601/17), unless it was set without the air carrier's knowledge.
- Sweden's Consumer Agency states that the claim is to be addressed to the airline, even where a flight-only ticket was bought through a travel agency.
- Exception for package holidays: if you are entitled to reimbursement from the organiser under package travel rules, you cannot claim the ticket price from the airline under the Regulation (Article 8(2); Court of Justice, C-163/18). The refund claim then goes to the organiser.
Reimbursement and compensation are two separate claims
Reimbursement under Article 8(1)(a) is about getting your money back for a journey that did not happen. The fixed compensation under Article 7 is something else: it is calculated by flight distance and falls away if the operating air carrier can prove that the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken (Article 5(3)), or if notice was given on the conditions set out in Article 5(1)(c). A ticket being reimbursed therefore does not mean you have been compensated, and an airline relying on extraordinary circumstances is not addressing the reimbursement. Provided the conditions in each article are met, you may be covered by both.
A delimitation from another judgment on the ticket price: in Case C-255/15, Mennens v Emirates Direktion für Deutschland (22 June 2016), the Court held that the price of the ticket to be taken into consideration is solely the price of the flight itself, to the exclusion of taxes and charges indicated on that ticket, as long as neither the requirement to pay those taxes and charges nor their amount depends on the class for which the ticket has been purchased. That statement concerns the basis of calculation on downgrading under Article 10(2). In Harms (paragraph 18) the Court did refer to Mennens, but for the principle that the price is to be determined by reference to the 'unavoidable' components the passenger has to pay in order to avail of the air carrier's service. Mennens is therefore not a statement about what the full cost of the ticket in Article 8(1)(a) covers, and should not be read as meaning that taxes and charges are generally deducted from a reimbursement.
You are the one who does not travel: then different rules apply
If you cancel the booking yourself, or fail to show up, it is not the airline that has cancelled the flight. Article 8(1)(a) then does not apply, and what happens to the ticket price is governed instead by the ticket conditions. Sweden's Consumer Agency is clear that there is no statutory right of withdrawal when you book a flight, and that the airline's own conditions apply, but that the journey can be cancelled.
On taxes and charges, the guidance comes from Sweden's Consumer Agency: it states that air tax is to be paid back whatever the ticket type, and that you are also to get back those charges the airline does not have to pay because you are not travelling. The agency states at the same time that the airline may charge a cost for making the refund, but only if that is set out in the conditions.
Sweden itself no longer has an air passenger tax: the Act on tax on air travel (2017:1200) was repealed with effect from 1 July 2025 (SFS 2024:1138), and no Swedish air tax is levied on departures from that date. So check your booking or receipt to see which taxes and charges are actually included in your price.
What the Consumer Agency is addressing, then, is air tax and charges the airline does not have to pay when you do not travel. The agency says nothing equivalent about the carrier's own ticket price or a booking site's service fee: there the conditions govern, and those items do not fall away by themselves when you stay at home.
Example: cancelled flight booked through a booking site
You buy Stockholm–Barcelona through a booking site that adds a service fee of its own. Four days before departure the operating air carrier cancels the flight and you choose reimbursement rather than re-routing. The starting point under Article 8(1)(a) is the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought, and under C-601/17 the booking site's commission is normally to be counted in, unless it was set without the air carrier's knowledge. The time limit is seven days and the form is governed by Article 7(3). Whether you may in addition be covered by compensation under Article 7 is assessed separately; choosing reimbursement does not affect that question.
How to claim back taxes and charges
Work out which rules apply to you
If the operating air carrier cancelled the flight, Article 8(1)(a) governs. If you are the one who does not travel, the ticket conditions govern, plus any air tax and the charges that according to Sweden's Consumer Agency are to be paid back.
Pull together the payment record
Keep the ticket, the order confirmation and the card statement. If a separate service or booking fee appears on the receipt, that detail can show the difference between what you paid and what the carrier received.
Address the claim to the right party
Sweden's Consumer Agency states that a claim for reimbursement is to be made to the airline even where a flight-only ticket was booked through a travel agency, and that you should complain in writing and keep a copy. If the flight is part of a package holiday, the refund claim generally goes to the organiser instead (Article 8(2); C-163/18).
Do not accept a voucher you did not ask for
Article 7(3) requires your signed agreement for travel vouchers and/or other services. If you want money, decline in writing and ask for an itemised breakdown of every item that has been deducted.
Frequently asked questions about reimbursement of taxes and charges
In Case C-601/17 the Court of Justice held that the price to be taken into consideration includes the difference between the amount paid by the passenger and the amount received by the air carrier, that is to say the intermediary's commission. The proviso is that the commission is not to be counted in if it was set without the air carrier's knowledge, a question the Court left to the national court. The service fee may therefore be covered, but the item can be disputed.
Article 8(1)(a) does not apply when you are the one who does not travel, and there is no statutory right of withdrawal when you book a flight. Sweden's Consumer Agency nevertheless states that air tax is to be paid back whatever the ticket type, and that you are also to get back those charges the airline does not have to pay because you are not travelling. Sweden abolished its own air passenger tax on 1 July 2025, so for a departure from Sweden this concerns other taxes and charges included in your price.
Article 8(1)(a) sets seven days for the reimbursement where a flight is cancelled, by the means provided for in Article 7(3). That time limit says nothing about how long a dispute takes to handle, and the Regulation sets no time limit for the refund that is governed by the ticket conditions when you cancel the booking yourself.
Check your compensation
Free preliminary check. You can change your choice later.
Another flight problemShow all 7 sources
Every factual statement in this article rests on one of the sources below: EU regulations, judgments of the EU Court of Justice and the authorities' own pages.
Sources
- Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Articles 8(1), 8(2), 7(3), 5(1)(c), 5(3) and 10(2) · EUR-Lex · Regulation · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Judgment in Case C-601/17, Dirk Harms and Others v Vueling Airlines SA (Eighth Chamber, 12 September 2018) · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the European Union · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-01
- Judgment in Case C-255/15, Steef Mennens v Emirates Direktion für Deutschland (Third Chamber, 22 June 2016) · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the European Union · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-01
- Act (2017:1200) on tax on air travel: repealed with effect from 1 July 2025 by SFS 2024:1138 (Swedish-language statute) · Swedish Parliament (Svensk författningssamling) · Other official · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Ångra eller avboka en flygresa (Cancelling or withdrawing from a flight booking) · Swedish Consumer Agency (Konsumentverket) · Authority · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Ska jag vända mig till resebyrån eller flygbolaget för återbetalning vid inställt flyg? (Should I turn to the travel agency or the airline for reimbursement when a flight is cancelled?) · Swedish Consumer Agency (Konsumentverket) · Authority · retrieved 2026-10-06
- Judgment in Case C-163/18, HQ and Others v Aegean Airlines SA (Third Chamber, 10 July 2019) · EUR-Lex / Court of Justice of the European Union · Case law · retrieved 2026-10-06
